On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 16:55 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:50 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > > On 2010-02-13 05:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> > >> FYI: I agree with Roman. I already removed the 0.42 aliasing feature > >> from Pd-extended 0.42.5 > > > > FYI: i agree with Roman, but i don't think it's a good idea to divert > > the behaviours of PdX and Pd in such cases: it will only make > > transition > > even nastier than it is. > > I see no way to support that 0.42 aliasing feature without mountains > of work to achieve poor results. Of course, anyone should feel free > to prove me wrong.
Could that problem be solved by removing the aliasing feature in the next release of Pd-vanilla, so that both Pd-extended and Pd-vanilla would be in sync again? Is it because I am biased or are there really hardly any voices advocating that feature? Roman _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list