Hi Miller, Thank you for your reply. I didn't know there could be such a difference in performance between two ARM chips. It seems very attractive indeed, and i think i'll contact the people at CCRMA to ask about the latency they achieved. If it's low enough i'll definitely give it a try.
Cheers, Pierre. 2012/12/17 Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu> > I could be wrong, but I believe the Beagleboard is ARMv7 and the Pi is > ARM v6 - so BB could easily have twice the floating-point erformance of > Pi. I'm not sure why and whether there would be any difference in Jack > for the two. I believe (but am not sure at all) that BB doesn't have the > same USB problems the Pi has. All in all it's still a very attractive > possibliity, perticularly since the Stanford people have tested and > exercised > it thoroughly. > > cheers > Miller > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:38:40PM +0100, Pierre Massat wrote: > > Dear List, > > > > I came accross this "Stompbox design workshop" ( > > https://ccrma.stanford.edu/wiki/Stompbox_2011). They use Pd on a > > beagleboard to make stompboxes. > > They talk about the older version of the beagleboard with a CPU running > at > > around 700 MHz. This is the same speed as the RPi's. > > > > I'm wondering what kind of latency they achieved on the beagleboard. > > Leaving aside the problem of the lack of audio in, don't you think we > > should be able to get the same performance on a raspberry pi ? > > Also, I wonder why JACK runs on the beagleboard and not on the RPi. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Pierre. > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list