Oh nevermind, I think I got it! Thanks :)
On 22 April 2014 11:50, Claire O'Connor <oconn...@tcd.ie> wrote: > Hi IOhannes, thanks for replying! I'm not sure I really understand your > explanation of a patch that I would use though, is there any way you could > make it clearer or attach a .pd file? Sorry, I'm just not great at all this! > > Thank you again! > > > On 22 April 2014 11:43, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote: > >> On 04/22/2014 12:31 PM, Claire O'Connor wrote: >> > Hey everyone, >> > >> > Just wondering if anyone knows how to control amplitude with 'readsf~'? >> I >> > want to use 'line~' to ramp it down but am unsure as to how it would all >> > connect up. >> >> [*~] >> >> multiplying an audio signal (like the output of [readsf~]) will >> "amplify" the signal. >> using [line~] to ramp it is very important if you care for smooth gain >> changes (most people do; and many people don't know that they can use >> [line~] for this - you are obviously among the blessed that do know) >> >> a classical "gain section" in your patch would look like: >> >> [nbx\ >> | >> [dbtorms] >> | >> [pack 0 50] >> | >> [line~] input signal >> | | >> [*~ ] >> | >> output signal >> >> >> gfmrdsa >> IOhannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
