Easy for me, the new stuff. I'm different because I didn't grow up with the stuff many of you did. Next it'll be 'A' flash units vs cube flash, or cube vs flash powder <g> I think it all depends on the generation, and nothing to do with the quality (not saying one is better than another). Perhaps the best photographers were those that didn't have any metering of any sort, used their brains to figure out what was best, and mixed their own powder to get the correct flash? <vbg>
Brad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:30 PM Subject: Hypothetical Question > > If Pentax...would > > have applied advances in autofocus, image > > stabilization...how many of you would > > be still shooting with Pentax (a majority brand)? Or > > would you be shooting Canon FD and poking jealous fun > > at Pentax snobs <G>? > > > Hah! Great point. > > Canon is so good at being Canon, nobody else has to be Canon.... > > So let me ask a hypothetical question here. Asked of everyone. IF you have > to choose between EITHER the older, metal bodied, manual focus Pentax family > (Spotmatics, M series, A series, up to LX) ***OR*** the > polycarbonate-bodied, AF Pentax family (P series, ZX series, up to > MZ-S)--and you couldn't mix and match and you couldn't use both--which would > it be? > > I guess since my main Pentax is an ESII you know which way I lean. > > --Mike > >
