Re: M lenses (long)

[Michel Carrère-Gée]

Mark Roberts a écrit:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
....
The M50/2.0 was their replacement for the K 55/2.0. That the K55/1.8 and
K55/2.0 were essentially the same lens internally doesn't affect their
pricing or place in the product line.
And the K55's aren replacement for Super-Takumar 1.8/55 and 2.0/55.
The 1.8/55 cost much more, but the 2.0/55 was strictly the same lens 
internally.
She is a "crippled" lens: a 1.8/55 with an internal ring to limit the 
max aperture at 2.0 !!!
You can see easily on a sample.

Michel