Like Cotty says, good performer and BIG. Reminds me of a 'pre'-300mm f4 A in shape and size. Becomes a nice 400mm with the old T6-2X converter, but 1.4 & 2.0A's work ok too. Overall much bigger and heavier than the Pentax 200/4 (K, M, or A), But the extra speed is great for focusing in the viewfinder... Regards, Bob S
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:59:19 +0000, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/11/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Is there any one on the list who has or has used the Pentax MF 200mm f2.5 ? > >If so what do you have to say about it? > > I owned one once. Big lens, solidly built, good performer IIRC, but > compared to a 2.8 80-200 zoom, not as flexible, which is why I sold it. > Good value therefore! > > Cheers, > Cotty > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > >
