this is just a guess but since it is faster, probably contrastier(sic?), probably sharper, and lighter, I bet it is.
JCO -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Arvidsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pentax MF 200mm f2.5? Was the 200/2.5 easier - faster to work with than the 80-200/2.8 at the long end, or no significant difference? Cheers, Ronald Cotty wrote: >On 11/11/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: > > > >>Is there any one on the list who has or has used the Pentax MF 200mm >>f2.5 ? >>If so what do you have to say about it? >> >> > >I owned one once. Big lens, solidly built, good performer IIRC, but >compared to a 2.8 80-200 zoom, not as flexible, which is why I sold it. >Good value therefore! > > > > >Cheers, > Cotty > > >___/\__ >|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche >||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com >_____________________________ > > > > >
