On 11/11/04, Ryan Lee, discombobulated, unleashed: >I completely agree with you about feels and looks; the ist D is a gorgeous >little thing, and it's not too shabby specwise either. However, I'm not >deeply invested in Pentax glass, and my love affair is more with the mz5n or >the mz3 bodies (samples of wonderfully thoughtful design). I'll be hanging >on to that forever, but having played around with the 20D, I can't say the >same- it almost feels like it's anticipating to be replaced already!
Let me guess, you're going to put tape over the word 'Canon', right? I think the *ist D is a beautiful and well-crafted piece of kit. But am I the only one on the planet who doesn't like it's small size? I love the weight and size of bigger bodies. (cue WW) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
