Hello, Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 12:13:09 AM, you wrote:
PJA> They're both well thought of the M is much smaller has a built in lens PJA> hood so it's a bit more convenient. The K is bigger and heavier, is a PJA> simpler optical formula and has a reputation for having the edge in PJA> sharpness and contrast. So as I understand K version of the lense is not so good as M version. Do I understand You correct? PJA> It's also a bit more difficult to find but few PJA> know just how good it is, it was a "bargain" lens when it was PJA> introduced, so you might pick one up inexpensively. PJA> I have a copy of PJA> the K version that I almost never use since I picked up the K 135 f2.5. I'm little a bit confused about all answers. So, whcih one produces better picture? If both of the version 'M' and 'K' will have the same price, which one You'll buy? Thanks. -- Best regards, dao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
