Yes you've said it before and I understood it before.
Why do you and others keep missing the point that I wrote Marco and was
planning on participating? Stop acting like I was not.
I have been defending my position, when attacked and ridiculed as being
ignorant and stupid when it comes to copyright laws, not bellyaching about
protocol.
It would be somehow ironic if any of the people who are bitching about
Pentax being slow in the marketplace somehow helped can a project that
could have, even in a small way, made the company more profitable.
Read again: Why do you and others keep missing the point that I wrote Marco
and was planning on participating? Stop acting like I was not.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Subject: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a
winner) With apologies to Mark
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:04:07 -0600
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have a winner)
What I don't understand is the ridicule I received from you and at least
one other on the list when I suggested that Pentax Canada did not follow
the normal protocol I would have expected.
As has been explained to you at least as often as you have brought the
point up is that this was something cooked up by a sales rep, not a summons
for photos by the Board of Directors.
One individual (likely a sales guy) seems to have set it up, he seems to
have, based on some hate mail and mail asking for legalese he wasn't
prepared to provide, decided to can his little project. That he was a
little prickly about it would be perfectly understandable if Aaron is being
factual about the less than polite missives.
No one likes having their face slapped.
This isn't the protocol you expected.
Get on with life and forget about it.
It would be somehow ironic if any of the people who are bitching about
Pentax being slow in the marketplace somehow helped can a project that
could have, even in a small way, made the company more profitable.
William Robb
