I have no personal experience with the A* 200 macro, only the A* 100. I've, however, read some good reviews. Personally, I prefer to manually focus when doing macro work. It tolerates my hyper-selective penchant to fuss with the scene without fighting me.
Jack --- Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I asked a few questions about FA* 200/4 macro which was in stock in > Poland a > few days ago. I went there today unfortunately in store it turned out > to be > "only" A* 200/4 macro. As I wanted good performance at longer > distances in > such a lens and A* users told me that it is not as good as FA* > version so I > resigned. But in the same store I bought FA* 85/1.4 brand new at 70% > of its > normal price in Europe ;-) So it wasn't that bad. But this A* 200/4 > macro > was so beautiful that I will keep my eye on it and think seriously > about > next enablement :-) > > -- > Balance is the ultimate good... > > Best Regards > Sylwek > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
