It sounds to me that IF, as Kodak claims, other companies have licensed or pay royalties for the exact same technology, then the claims may indeed be valid.
I really enjoyed reading the Talkback headers below the story... :-) Tom On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > The headline is Kodak is suing Apple and RIM for patent infringement. When I > read about the nature of the patents involved ... > > "Kodak alleges that Apple is infringing on two patents covering image > preview and the processing of images of different resolutions. The second > suit is focused on technology that allows one application to ask another > program for help completing a computing task." > > ... it occurred to me that here is revealed Kodak's survival tactic: patent > troll! :-) > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=29558&tag=nl.e589 > > > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
