On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts > or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too > much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would > have paid to be able to use all those bodies again without film.
If phase one can make a digital back for your hasselblad, they can make one for your pentax, and it might only cost half the price. > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: >> This is very intriguing >> http://re35.net/ >> >> -- >> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
