Radio triggers it is, then.
Thanks!
-- Walt
On 6/4/2013 8:56 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Yeah, but not well. And with radio triggers being as little as ten
bucks a unit, there's no reason to torture yourself with flaky
line-of-sight optical stuff. I've done it both ways; radio triggers
win hands-down.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:51 PM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
I think he had something like this in mind.
http://www.amazon.com/Seagull-SYK-4-Optical-Trigger-Socket/sim/B0028DM1YA/2
They'd work.
From: Bruce Walker
Sorry, Walt, these are strictly useful now as fully manual. They
support TTL, but your cameras don't. And they don't have any slave
functions at all.
To use these wirelessly you need to get some cheap wireless triggers,
like the Cowboy Studios NPT-04's ($20 for Tx/Rx).
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Walt <ldott...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Bruce.
Do you suppose they'd be good as slaves when used with optical triggers?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
