> -----Original Message-----
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C
> 
> Goodness gracious. When do you ever find time to use all that stuff?
> 


I don't.

B
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob W
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 12:49 PM
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: Which camera brand would you choose, if you 
> started from scratch?
> 
> > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of 
> Steve Cottrell
> >
> > On 19/10/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> > >All of your camera gear has been stolen, but the insurance
> > company has
> > >given you a check to replace it with the brand new
> > equivalent, or good
> > >quality used for fear that is no longer made. How would you
> > spend your
> > >money replacing your kit.
> >
> > Buy getting the same stuff again.
> >
> 
> When my Pentax stuff was stolen I tried to get all the same 
> stuff again, but it wasn't available. The insurance policy 
> was new-for-old, and I didn't like what Pentax had to offer 
> at that time, so I bought Contax / Zeiss, which was fabulous 
> film gear. It didn't translate well to digital, though, so I 
> later traded it in for a Leica M8 and a lens or two.
> 
> My basic requirements in camera equipment haven't changed 
> much over the
> years:
> 
> robust, weather/dust-proof
> good, large, bright viewfinder
> high quality lenses
> simplicity and ease-of-use
> 
> Situations in which I use it:
> 
> casual, flaneur-type of stuff (street photography, I suppose) 
> travel photography, including cycling and backpacking
> 
> The focal length range I like is uncontroversial, although 
> it's nice to be able to go outside that from time to time. In 
> 35mm terms, this means a normal range of about 24mm to 100mm 
> covers just about everything, and I have a set of prime 
> lenses as well as zooms that cover that range. I also have a 
> 21mm prime and a 100-400mm (equivalent) zoom.
> 
> So if I had to replace it all, I would buy a Leica M with 
> 21mm, 28mm, 35mm, 50mm & 90mm lenses. I already have all 
> these, but an M8 rather than an M. I would also replace my M3 
> like-for-like if that were stolen.
> 
> I like the Fuji X100, but I would probably replace it with a 
> Fuji X20 - and I am considering doing just that anyway.
> 
> I really like the Olympus E series, for which I have 3 high 
> quality zooms covering 22-400mm equivalent. I have an E-3 
> with battery grip which is superb, although rather heavy. 
> It's annoying that they've dropped that line.
> There may be better things out there now, some of the 
> top-end-but-not-very-top full-frame Nikons are appealing, and 
> I would give a lot of thought to them. When I was replacing 
> my Pentax gear though I looked at the F3, and it was too much 
> of a monster. Having become used to lugging 3 LXes around, I 
> could barely even lift 3 F3s with the equivalent lenses and winders.
> 
> B
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
> above and follow the directions. 
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
> above and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to