On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Does it sounds crazy? :)
>
> It's a bit over the edge. In my opinion, a trained eye can probably do a
> better job of image evaluation than can any software.
Indeed a trained eye (and brain) would be able to make a more
informed decision than a simple-minded algorithm. However even the
eye must use some tools in its assessment. For example a person uses
eye-glasses to aid sight, and this is exactly what I'm trying to find:
a special pair of "eye-glasses" that highlight which parts of the
image are in focus, etc.
I don't necessarily want a solution that spits out a number and
says "photo (A) is 10% better than photo (B)". I'm just looking for a
solution that "prepares" photo (A) and (B) to ease my evaluation.
Ciprian.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
