I much prefer the original. There is something particularly ominous in the colors of the clouds.
Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> wrote: > > > Brian, > > I like the B&W version much better. > > I hadn't seen the original thread until just now, while writing this > message. So, I saw the B&W version first. > I even thought that the "original" was actually a dirivative - colored with > a "creative" filter, and went back to reread your message to verify that I > understood it correctly. > (I admit, it was before 8am, so, I was still waking up.) > > B&W is more interesting, more dramatic. > I wanted to see it on a larger scale. So, I zoomed in using the browser. > At that scale, the colored version is fine, and it can stand on its own. And > it delivers a different mood. > But I still prefer the B&W version. > > (And I just thought that the dramatism of the B&W version reminds me of one > of the B&W storm images of Dan Matyola. [You know that guy, don't ya? ;-) ]) > > Igor > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Brian Walters wrote: > >> Larry wondered: >> >> "I can't help but wonder what sort of tonality it would have in black >> and white, it could be amazing, or it could suck." >> >> So I hit it with Silver Efex Pro 2 and here's what I got: >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_ >> IGP7858-K5-1b-bw.html >> >> And the original: >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_ >> IGP7858-K5-1-peso.html >> >> So, sucky or....?? >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Brian > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
