Charles Jannuzi wrote: > >The science report > is that sad sick pretense of an exercise in c/v > building that pretends we can. > The basis both of "SCIENCE" (deified -- as at Sceptical Inquiere) and of SCIENCE (demonized -- as with Carl & too many others) -- is the Platonic argument that a mathematician is not a mathematician when he/she is making a mistake. Both (Carl & Sceptical Inquirer) are pitching religous woo-woo and can't tell us much about the actual world. Carrol
- bullying Michael Perelman
- Re: bullying Lisa Stolarski
- Re: Re: bullying Carrol Cox
- Re: bullying Charles Jannuzi
- RE: Re: bullying Devine, James
- Re: RE: Re: bullying Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: RE: Re: bullying Doug Henwood
- Re: bullying Charles Jannuzi
- Re: What is science Charles Jannuzi
- Re: Re: Re: What is science Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: What is science ken hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: What is sci... Carrol Cox
- Re: bullying Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: bullying Charles Jannuzi
- Re: bullying Charles Jannuzi
- Re: RE: Re: bullying Lisa Stolarski
- Re: bullying Charles Jannuzi
- Re: bullying Tom Walker
- Re: bullying Charles Jannuzi
- Re: bullying Tom Walker