On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 00:00, Caleb Cushing <xenoterrac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having a little debate over this on a Perl::Critic ticket. I'm not
> sure anyone is sure and the docs don't say.
>
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=69234
>
>
> is it package foo { ... 1; } or package foo { ... }; 1; ? or what?
> and is it possible this could get clarified in the next edition of the
> docs?
> --
> Caleb Cushing
>
> http://xenoterracide.com
>
My take on this is that
package Foo {
}
is the same thing as
{
package Foo;
}
Therefore, if your style allowed
{
package Foo;
1;
}
then it should allow
package Foo {
1;
}
However, I think you can make a good argument for not allowing that.
A module is not a package. The fact that it is customary for modules
to consist of one package sometimes confuses this, but there is no
requirement that a module include a package at all. From that basis,
I would argue that
package Foo {
}
1;
is more correct.
--
Chas. Owens
wonkden.net
The most important skill a programmer can have is the ability to read.
