I suspect its the diff flags I use when I send to Dan. I use -urN (or --newfile) which should create the new file if it doesn't exist but this happened last time I made a new file as well. That always worked when I used to send patches to linux-kernel but I guess I could get with the program and learn CVS. :(
Dan what flags to you give patch when applying a recursive diff? -Melvin Smith IBM :: Atlanta Innovation Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 770-835-6984 (Embedded image moved to "David M. Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> file: 01/09/2002 02:50 PM pic05149.pcx) To: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Melvin Smith/ATLANTA/Contr/IBM@IBMUS, Parrot Internals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Problem with MANIFEST (missing io/io_unix.c) On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 02:39 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > >Must be Dan's magic fingers again. I renamed io_os.c to io_unix.c but > >probably > >it got lost in the shuffle. > > Weird. It's in my local MANIFEST from the patch, and CVS is convinced > that it's up to date. Resync? After fresh resync: [usrodl@ohno io]$ ls -l total 31 drwxr-xr-x 2 usrodl other 512 Jan 9 13:26 CVS/ -rw-r--r-- 1 usrodl other 444 Jan 3 21:57 TODO -rw-r--r-- 1 usrodl other 13850 Jan 9 12:23 io.c -rw-r--r-- 1 usrodl other 8000 Jan 9 12:23 io_stdio.c -rw-r--r-- 1 usrodl other 7051 Jan 9 12:23 io_win32.c No io_unix.c *or* io_os.c for that matter. - D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pic05149.pcx
Description: Binary data