On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:37:21AM +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote: > Stephen P. Potter wrote: > > Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > whispered > > : > > | Here's a counter-proposal: throw out hashes as a separate internal > > | data type, and in its place define a set of operators which treat > > | (properly constructed) arrays as associative arrays. It's the > > > > Doesn't it make more sense to get rid of arrays and just use hashes? > > > No, neither proposal makes sense. Arrays can be stored compactly and $a[1_000_000_000] = 'oh, really?' # :-) > accessed and iterated through quickly, because they can take advantage of > the fact that they are always indexed by an integer. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringif... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringif... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringif... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringif... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringif... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringif... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with ... Jeremy Howard
- Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (s... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace =>... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Repl... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Repl... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying com... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying com... John Porter