Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > Arrays can be stored compactly and > > $a[1_000_000_000] = 'oh, really?' # :-) But that is far less common than @a{ 0..100 } = (...); which, if stored in a hash, would not only be significantly less efficient than an array, but could generally be expected to elicit some pathological behavior of the hashing function. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace =>... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Repl... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) Repl... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Array storage (was Re: RFC 84 (v1) ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying com... Peter Scott
- John Porter