Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
>
> I'll give you my comments right now ... It seems we are eliminating
> punctuation to make the language simpler in one respect, yet, because
> of that, creating new punctuation so that we can use the language in
> ways we are used to. If that must be the case, then I say, if it
> ain't broke, don't fix it!
I think you're right.
foo hash= bar;
but then we may as well
foo.hash_assign( bar );
And we don't want to go there.
--
John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Karl Glazebrook
