John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Damian Conway wrote: > Well, as I mentioned in another recent parallel thread, if C<for> is to > be properly functionalized, I deliberately stated "built-in functions", not "keywords". Please consult Tom's list and my addendum: Tom Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Keywords that *cannot* be overridden are chop, defined, delete, do, > dump, each , else, elsif, eval, exists, for, foreach, format, glob, > goto, grep, if, keys, last, local, m, map, my, next, no, package, > pop, pos, print, printf, prototype, push, q, qq, qw, qx, redo, > return, s, scalar, shift, sort, splice, split, study, sub, tie, > tied, tr, undef, unless, unshift, untie, until, use, while, and y. Johan Vromans added: > Hmm. Quite a few of these should no longer be special: > > chop, defined, delete, dump, each, exists, glob, grep, keys, map, > pop, pos, print, printf, prototype, push, scalar, shift, sort, > splice, split, study, tie, tied, undef?, unshift, untie. -- Johan
- RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be functions Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be fun... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be fun... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functi... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functi... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in fu... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in fu... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... Tom Christiansen