Hi,
I think, that David's version is matches with my opinion. I don't think,
that "beginners" would be a better name for it, but maybe more
practical, as it's a more evident name.
Bye,
Andras
David Storrs wrote:
On Jun 15, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
And here they are... this is just a draft -- feel free to flame/edit/
tear it apart liberally. These are also written assuming we don't
create a perl6-general list (but it shouldn't be hard to adapt them
should one be created).
Well, I'd suggest the following. (Anything not mentioned stays as you
wrote it.)
perl6-language
This is the "theory of" list. Discussion of the design of the perl6
language, and its desired (or unwanted) feature list. If you have
patches and/or suggestions for improving the Perl 6 design documents
(Apocalypses, Synopses, etc.), send them here.
perl6-howto
This is the "practice of" list. Come here to ask "How do I...", "What
does XYZ mean?", or "Why doesn't this work?" Novices are especially
welcome.
(Note: I envision this list being much like beginners@perl.org, but I
never liked that name because it seems like it would drive away those
who have a question but do not consider themselves beginners. On the
other hand, maybe it's more important to explicitly welcome novices. I
could go either way: maybe the above list should be 'perl6-beginners')
