Kirrily Skud Robert writes: > Wasn't he meant to be keeping us up to date with snippets of what he's > doing/thinking about? I recall Nat posting a couple of months ago that > he'd talked to Larry and Larry had said he'd do this. I think the problem is that the RFCs aren't really a list of the things he has to consider. The RFCs illustrate areas of potential change (REs, OO, little language extensibility) that are all overlapping to some extent. This, I think he's discovered, doesn't lend itself to periodic updates. Nat
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Edward Peschko
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... John Porter
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programmin... Adam Turoff
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Edward Peschko
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Dan Sugalski
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Edward Peschko
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Kirrily Skud Robert
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Nathan Torkington
- Re: "Art Of Unix Programmin... Nathan Torkington
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Nathan Torkington
- Re: "Art Of Unix Progra... Simon Cozens
- "Art of Unix Programming" on perl Edward Peschko