On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 10:14:36AM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > As much as I'm not for it, would > > having > > sub foo :method {} # In objects vtbl > and > sub foo {} # only if procedural call > > being a valid construct and having perl dispatch appropriately, be > viable? What does it mean ? Can the first only ever be called as a methoed and the second as a procedure ? Will we have to define both foo's ? Graham.
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Bart Lateur
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Hildo Biersma
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Bart Lateur
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Bart Lateur
- Re: How to implement both object->method and m... John Berthels
- Re: How to implement both object->method a... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... John Berthels
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Tim Bunce
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Michael Fowler
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... David L. Nicol
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Tim Bunce
- Re: How to implement both object->meth... Graham Barr
- Re: How to implement both object->method and module... Michael Fowler