Apple Mail has not been copying the mailing list, so excuse the reposts if you 
got one.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Elliot Chance <elliotcha...@gmail.com>
> Date: 14 November 2010 12:30:19 PM AEDT
> To: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum
> 
> 
> On 14/11/2010, at 6:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
>> Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> writes:
>>> It's a shame that a forum can't act as a front-end for a mailing list, so
>>> signing up to the forum actually signs you up to a mailing list (if you're
>>> not already signed up), but without receiving any emails.  Messages posted
>>> to the forum would get sent to the list, and vice versa.
>> 
>> That would be cool.  Wonder if there's something like that out there already.
> 
> I have no problem with this idea. Rather than trying to write a MOD to do 
> this you (or someone) could create a new account with the mailing list 
> address, then subscribe that account to all or some of the forums. Any posts 
> made will be send to the subscriber (which is the mailing list) with nice 
> URLs to reply. This could be implemented immediately.
> 
> "Content is king." There is a huge amount of archives, and before creating 
> the forum I did think of ways to cleanly get all the archives into the forums 
> but its fraught with problems, for example to map the email users to fresh 
> accounts would require creating forums accounts with generic passwords or 
> having to contact the original mailing list posters to give them their forum 
> password ... messy. More importantly that information belongs to the greater 
> postgres community and I would have no right to simply copy it all without 
> permission.
> 
> I use other mailing lists (musicbrainz.org, for example) and they work as 
> intended but often you want to ask a question and not get dozens of emails 
> coming to you about other issues. This is where forums are useful (yes, 
> musicbrainz has a forum of which I am a moderator) - but some people like 
> them and some don't, theres no reason why that has to change.
> 
> To those who say, it won't work and therefore don't bother. To not even try 
> when forums are clearly one ideal alternative for the postgres community 
> seems silly. Even the largest forums had to start with 0 posts, I don't 
> expect it to take off over night but it has to start somewhere.
> 
> The potential is only as strong as the community is willing. I understand 
> nobody wants to sign up to an empty forum but the forum can only grow with 
> support from the majority of people on this list (if they so choose.)
> 
> Thanks to the first 4 people who did sign up, feel free to make some posts :)
> 
>> 
>>> And such a system
>>> would need to support cross-posting too somehow.
>> 
>> Dunno, seems like we've been discouraging cross-posting lately anyhow.
>> I wouldn't see anything wrong with forum posts only being able to go to
>> one mailing list, as long as there were a forum corresponding to each
>> active list.
>> 
>>                      regards, tom lane
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
> 

Reply via email to