> On Oct 9, 2017, at 13:01, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hmm. Is it possible that the process is replaying the abort of a
> transaction with a lot of subtransactions?
That's possible, although we're now talking about an hours-long delay at this
point.
> Is that number changing at all?
Increasing:
# select mode, count(*) from pg_locks where pid=5882 group by mode;
mode | count
---------------------+-------
ExclusiveLock | 1
AccessExclusiveLock | 8810
(2 rows)
--
-- Christophe Pettus
x...@thebuild.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
