> On 24 Apr 2024, at 11:13, Anton A. Melnikov <a.melni...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On 24.04.2024 12:02, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 19.04.24 05:50, Anton A. Melnikov wrote: >>> >>> May be better use this macro everywhere in C code? >> I don't know. I don't find XLOG_CONTROL_FILE to be a very intuitive proxy >> for "pg_control".
Maybe, but inconsistent usage is also unintuitive. > Then maybe replace XLOG_CONTROL_FILE with PG_CONTROL_FILE? > > The PG_CONTROL_FILE_SIZE macro is already in the code. > With the best regards, XLOG_CONTROL_FILE is close to two decades old so there might be extensions using it (though the risk might be slim), perhaps using offering it as as well as backwards-compatability is warranted should we introduce a new name? -- Daniel Gustafsson
