Hi Alvaro, Alvaro Herrera [2008-12-05 14:06 -0300]: > Of course, as is it's not acceptable; the version number should be > obtained from PG_VERSION or some such.
Right, it has actually been on my long-term wishlist to replace that patch with an autoconfiscated one with a non-hardcoded version number. I just didn't do it yet because it was generally rejected when I proposed it upstream some years ago. > I am not sure the "libpq5" versioning is best; maybe we don't change the > API but we could certainly change error messages between versions. I > think we should keep it as libpq-8.3, like the rest. Doesn't make much of a difference indeed, I just made it match the package name. Also, libpq5 built from -8.3 is used with postgresql-8.2 as well. Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
