On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 17:22 +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote: > > * There is no mention of what to do with pg_notify at checkpoint. > Look > > at how pg_subtrans handles this. Should pg_notify do the same? > > Actually we don't care... We even hope that the pg_notify pages are > not flushed at all. Notifications don't survive a server restart > anyway and upon restart we just delete whatever is in the directory.
Suspected that was true, just checking it was commented somewhere. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
