On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> 99% of the time, you'd be right. But this is an unusual case, for the >>> reasons I mentioned before. > >> I tend to agree with Nikolay. I can't see much upside in making this >> change. At best, nothing will break. At worst, something will break. >> But how do we actually come out ahead? > > We come out ahead by not having to make the documentation more confusing. > > Basically, we have the opportunity to fix an ancient mistake here at > very low cost. I do not think that doubling down on the mistake is > a better answer.
I'm not convinced, but we don't have to agree on everything... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
