В письме от 31 мая 2016 15:38:38 пользователь Robert Haas написал:
> >>> 99% of the time, you'd be right. But this is an unusual case, for the > >>> reasons I mentioned before. > >> > >> I tend to agree with Nikolay. I can't see much upside in making this > >> change. At best, nothing will break. At worst, something will break. > >> But how do we actually come out ahead? > > > > We come out ahead by not having to make the documentation more confusing. > > > > Basically, we have the opportunity to fix an ancient mistake here at > > very low cost. I do not think that doubling down on the mistake is > > a better answer. > > I'm not convinced, but we don't have to agree on everything... I am not convinced too. But I will not argue hard for the patch as far as my main goal was to report inconsistency. Through the I consider Tom's proposal quite strange... -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
