Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-05-10 10:29:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> As long as it doesn't block, the change in lock strength doesn't actually >> make any speed difference does it?
> The issue isn't the strength, but that we currently have this weird > hackery around open_share_lock(): Oh! I'd forgotten about that. Yes, if we change that then we'd need to do some performance checking. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers