On 5/10/17, 8:10 PM, "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree to report per-table information. Especially In case of one of > tables specified failed during vacuuming, I think we should report at > least information of tables that is done successfully so far.
+1 I believe you already get all per-table information when you do not specify a table name (“VACUUM VERBOSE;”), so I would expect to get this for free as long as we are building this into the existing ExecVacuum(…) and vacuum(…) functions. Nathan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
