James William Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been writing a PQ client and I have come to think that a
> "supported PQ versions request startup packet" would be useful to client
> authors.
Given that it'd be guaranteed not to work with any existing server
versions, I find the usefulness a bit debatable...
In particular I disagree with the premise that clients should expend an
extra connection setup/teardown cycle to find out which protocol
versions the server supports. We change protocol versions seldom enough
that I think the optimal strategy is "try the newest version you know
of, then back off one at a time until it works". This is always optimal
if the server is newer than the client, and it's only pessimal if the
server is much older than the client --- how often does that happen?
To put it more concretely: there are currently only two protocol
versions in live use (V1 died a long time ago). If you try V3 and then
V2, you will expend either one or two connection cycles, with the
average converging towards one as time passes and more people update
their servers. If you probe for the right answer and then do it, you
will always expend two connection cycles. That is a win how exactly?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
