On Jan 28, 2008 2:26 PM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sure, but do you know, Tom dislikes new columns in pg_proc :).
Tom doesn't seem to like the idea of obfuscation of function code much either :-) > This > patch is usable sample of one possible solution and doesn't need > initdb. And there is dependency on pgcrypto :(. But it is simply and > it does all what is expected. Some customers wonted it. But I am not > sure if similar patch can be accepted - this is prototype. And when > I'll have some signals so patch can be commited I'll send final > version with obfuscate col in pg_proc. Any patch of pg_proc needs two > hours of work, and any change needs actualization - so lot of maybe > useless work. Yeah, I realise tweaking pg_proc is a large job, and wouldn't expect you to necessarily do it immediately - I just wanted to throw my requirements from a tools perspective into the inevitable discussion. Cheers, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
