On 03.11.2008, at 15:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Yes good idea, to have 2 differents names, but why Pharo-IDE ? There
is no IDE in the core version ?
There is only a minimal one, and it will be further reduced in the
future. So, for real work, it is suggested to use the "IDE" image,
which includes all the productivity tools like autocompletion and
syntax highlighting (for a list see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Packages)
. However, for a Seaside server I would rather use the core to
reduce the memory footprint.
I tend to agree with Serge on this. Having IDE in the name might be
confusing for people.
Why not to have Pharo-standard and Pharo-Enterprise ?
The idea is that the version *with* the tools is the standard. Not the
one without. ;-)
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
