I'm cleaning the scriptloader and update list because there were intertwined 
fixes.
I will redo them in order. 
We need a scriptable source.

Stef

On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> HI guys
> 
> to lower my stress I removed from the update stream the items related to my 
> MethodReference changes.
> so please update from 12016
> Benjamin I will try to find what is the problem.
> 
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> 
>> I was trying to clean a bit MethodReference and now I broke the merge in 
>> Monticello.
>> Now I get all the method with revision changed
>> 
>> So what do we do?
>> 
>> The changes were to help the integration of the new recentMessages changes
>> 
>> 1- rollback because I do not have the time to dive into this part of the 
>> system. 
>> We need a better and cleaner infrastructure with a real declarative code 
>> model and not a hack like methodReference and tweak it to get 
>> comments and class definition on it. I hate that we have so lousy and 
>> brittle foundation
>> 
>> 2- let it and try to understand why it breaks. But I have no time (now this 
>> stuff will stay in my mind until I check -grgrg).
>> 
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to