Thanks rcs, I'll go ahead and start using picolisp built with mingw-32 for now and familiarize myself with it. Thanks for the confirmation - it's good to know that it works :) Regards, Kashyap
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:31 PM r cs <secri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kashyap: > > In case you didn't know this, MinGW produces MSVC executables compatible > with normal Windows, so you just can grab the EXE out of the msys > environment and run it on any computer where the MSVC redistributable from > Microsoft has already been installed. > > I've personally built PicoLisp under MinGW-32 on Windows 7, copied the EXE > from where I built it in msys under > /MinGW/msys/1.0/home/myUser/picoLisp/src to some place else on the > system, and then just run it from a command prompt. Using *make* is also > a lot less work than dealing with an IDE. I only use '32 because it is > easy to install and I've been using it for years, but the newer '64 should > work the same way. > > Cheers, > rcs > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 9:55 PM C K Kashyap <ckkash...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to use picolisp built on MSVC. I am planning to start trying to >> compile miniPicoLisp (it should really be nano :) ) using MSVC. >> >> I was wondering if anyone has already done this. >> >> MinGW does not quit work for me (I don't have strong technical reasons >> for this). WSL does not work for me because I intend to use existing DLLs >> which I don't suppose would be straightforward to use from WSL. >> >> Regards, >> Kashyap >> > > > -- > *Níl aon tinteán mar do thinteán féin. *[Irish Gaelic] > (There is no fireside like your own fireside.) > > >
