On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:23 AM, David Vrensk <da...@icehouse.se> wrote: > Yup. But the point is to count children, so if there is no child on the > row, there is nothing to count.
I suppose the point is to count descendents + the base, but I should have been more clear. > BTW, you didn't say if you wanted to count children or descendants (i.e. > children and children's children). From your follow-up, I gather it's about > descendants This looks very much like what I'm after. I'll verify against the data, of course, but thank you very much. -- +rw The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
