Hi, On 03/28/2014 08:56 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 05:21:59PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:12:08AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >>> Which in the end turns out to be much nicer too, since it gets rid of >>> needing >>> a udev-helper too. After this much too long introduction I'll let the >>> patches >>> speak for themselves. >> >> Yeah, I was coming to the conclusion that this was probably the best we >> could do. It's unfortunate that "id" is already in use - we'd be able to >> get away without any X server modifications otherwise. >> >> Long term we probably still want to tie serio devices to the ACPI >> devices in case the vendor provides power management calls there, but we >> can leave that until there's an actual example. > > I am still unsure if we shoudl be adding these new IDs to serio core... > Can't the X driver take a peek at ACPI devices on it's own?
The problem is there is no way for userspace to know which /sys/devices/pnp0/00:xx device is the serio bus host. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
