I'll -1 anything that has java.awt in it unless someone definatively proves that it will not load X libraries. (So far from what I've seen its the linkage to awt not an actual call that causes X libraries to be loaded).
Rainer Klute wrote: >>>I think the return type of this as a convenience method ought to be a >>>java.awt.Image. Maybe one version returns a byte array and one returns an >>> >>-1 - this ties us to X-Windows on servers and limits our crossplatform >>nature and his performance heavy. Leave this to the API user to >>tradeoff (ties to awt or not). >> > >Definitely not. A java.awt.Image instance is just data. It ties us >to nothing except Java. See also my other post. > >Best regards >Rainer Klute > > Rainer Klute IT-Consulting GmbH i. Gr. > Dipl.-Inform. > Rainer Klute E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Körner Grund 24 Telefon: +49 172 2324824 >D-44143 Dortmund Telefax: +49 231 5349423 > >
