On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 07:49:55AM +0200, Robert Felber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 04:16:30PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > 
> > > I have upgraded to 0.1.14.5 today, will make the suggested configuration
> > > changes, and see what happens.
> > 
> > After upgrading to 0.1.14.5, I am continuing to receive timeout errors:
> > 
> > 
> >     61: postfix/smtpd: warning: problem talking to server 127.0.0.1:12525: 
> > Connection timed out
> > 
> >     35: postfix/smtpd: warning: timeout on 127.0.0.1:12525 while reading 
> > input attribute name
> 
> 
> I now require more verbose debugging of the system environment at such errors.
> 
> Can you write a logwrapper which calls lsof, netstat and ps  to see how much
> process are up, which state, for how long, which queue-fills, etc.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Also, I'm still getting weird rbl_lookup errors, but now with more detail:
> > 
> > 
> >     3: policyd-weight: rbl_lookup: unknown error: 
> > out:145.20.15.204.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, 
> > in:145.20.15.204.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, out-id:65536, in-id:0
> >     3: policyd-weight: rbl_lookup: unknown error: 
> > out:5.200.113.208.list.dsbl.org, in:5.200.113.208.list.dsbl.org, 
> > out-id:65536, in-id:0
> >     3: policyd-weight: rbl_lookup: unknown error: 
> > out:65.135.144.24.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, 
> > in:65.135.144.24.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, out-id:65536, in-id:0
> >     3: policyd-weight: rbl_lookup: unknown error: 
> > out:mx185.technologygrouptwentytwo.com.abuse.rfc-ignorant.org, 
> > in:mx185.technologygrouptwentytwo.com.abuse.rfc-ignorant.org, out-id:65536, 
> > in-id:0
> 
> Which DNS servers are in between? Polw sent 65536 as packet-id out, and got 0
> in return (which I see the first time).


65536 appears to be problematic. I have fixed this now in 0.1.14.6


Although I assume your timeouts will continue, thus I am still interested
in system states at such timeouts.




-- 
    Robert Felber (PGP: 896CF30B)
    Munich, Germany

____________________________________________________________
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/

Reply via email to