On 02/10/09 23:54, Hodges, Jeff wrote:
Instead of adding them all in v1, we should allow / encourage this kind of experimentation by defining a forwards-compatible grammar for the STS header.Agreed, see the thread entitled "more flexible ABNF for STS?"
That would be a great thing :-) I suggest allowing comma/space-separated key=value pairs or simple tokens, and suggesting an X- prefix for unstandardised keys or tokens.
Gerv
