On Wed, 27.05.09 11:15, Patrick Shirkey ([email protected]) wrote:
> Do you or anyone else have a specific reasoning for using only the > jackdbus version? Is is just because the person who wrote the code > wrote it to work with jackdbus? The logic for handing over device access is based on D-Bus. And afaiu only jackdbus interfaces with D-Bus right now. http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/device-reservation.html > Is this something that could be handled in a different way to give > legacy jack users this feature? Just upgrade. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
