Dnia 2010-07-19, pon o godzinie 22:44 -0400, Andreas Kloeckner pisze: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:48:06 +0200, Fabrizio Milo aka misto > <mistob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello to every one. > > > > So I downloaded pycuda again after some times and installed it. > > > > I really really liked the new feature to download auto-magically the > > boost requirements. very very nice. > > I figured--I recently gave a tutorial on PyOpenCL at SciPy'10 [1], and > 'please get rid of @$...@#%@!! boost' was a rather frequent complaint. So > I got to work, and it turned out that shipping the required part of > Boost is a pretty reasonable proposition--with the shipped boost bits, > the binary image only grows from 1 meg to 1.4 megs. (The source tarball > does grow by about a meg, but I figure that's fine.) I committed the same > boost-inclusion changes to PyCUDA about a week later. >
Could you put the new source archives (for both PyCUDA and PyOpenCL) on PyPI? I would like to see how to deal with such changed source file in packaging. BTW, for anyone interested - PyOpenCL is in Debian unstable for architecture amd64 (sorry, not yet for i386 - buildd has some problems with non-free and contrib building). As for PyCUDA, there is not yet NVIDIA toolkit in Debian. -- Tomasz Rybak <bogom...@post.pl> GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860 Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A 488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860 http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ PyCUDA mailing list PyCUDA@tiker.net http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pycuda
