On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 17:50 +0000, James Gardner wrote: > Unless I've set something up very wrong, that means that there is about > a 1ms overhead using Nginx as a proxy compared to doing the requests > directly but that using HTTP is about 5 times faster than using FastCGI. > Should I be using a different version of Nginx?
0.4.13 is pretty old, but I'm still surprised by that amount of overhead. Maybe you could try with the latest (0.5.12) version? > > I would say though that Nginx is very easy to setup and I do like it, > even if the FastCGI setup doesn't seem faster than the HTTP setup with > Pylons. Most of the benchmarks I've seen (which is only a couple) have shown FastCGI on Nginx to be slightly faster than proxying, although by a very small amount. Regards, Cliff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
