Why is there so much different in response time? On Jul 21, 5:48 pm, Antonio Beamud Montero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 11:11 +0200, Wichert Akkerman escribió: > > > > > Mike Orr wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > >> Previously Mike Orr wrote: > > >>> Of course, that will diminish Mako's amazing speed. It remains to be > > >>> seen how much of a difference it makes. Perhaps down the road Mako > > >>> can be patched to put cached templates in Datastore. Cc'ing Mke Bayer > > >>> for comments. > > >> It's certainly better than genshi, but I wouldn't call it amazing. There > > >> are some new kids on the block that are a lot faster. See for example > > >>http://hannosch.blogspot.com/2008/07/project-messerschmidt-vs-nkotb.html > > > > How did Genshi rate six times faster than Mako? That doesn't sound > > > plausable. Genshi has to parse and render XML, and convert tokens to > > > HTML. Mako and Cheetah run compiled Python functions that build up a > > > string. > > > You're reading the graph the wrong way around: it lists pages per second, > > not rendering time. In other words zope.pagetemplate is insanely slow and > > spitfire insanely fast. > > Ops, this benchmark has worried to me: > > Mako Template 240.77 ms > > weaponx:~/Projects/spitfire/tests/perf> php5 bigtable.php > Smarty template: 13.16 ms > PHP: 6.24 ms > > I'm using mako and I think there is too much difference with php... no? > > Greetings.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
